It would be easy for me to make this post about what I likes about what I read [pg 1-14] but i will be pointing out what I didn't like. For the sake of the post I will use the "What will Kate Middleton's wedding dress look like". First off In no way am I saying I have a problem with the royal family, This post is about what I don't like about this article. First off think back to the over-hype of the royal wedding, I mean you couldn't go anywhere and not see a magazine without a story about it. This article to me is just more over hyping it. I get that people went crazy about it however, you saw everything capitalizing off the hype. As I read this I am thinking why should people and especially why should I care what her dress looks like because it is purely her choice what it will be. Why should we care if its "traditional" or "traditional with a twist"? But obviously as we all saw any and every magazine, tabloid, webpage went crazy picking apart every single thing about them they could.
Another thing with this coloumn was it was actually kind of boring to me. Now I know not everything I read can be a mind blowing piece of writing like Lord of the Rings/Hobbit or Throne of Glass but I couldn't help but feel bored reading it. It could be I just was never caught up in the hype of the royal family. But I just was bored reading this article; I do recognize that not every article/ column was like this believe me there were good ones out there. Then again the style of columns are pretty new to me, but this one just was UN-interesting to me. I do appreciate what It was trying to do. I'm not so dense as to let what I don't like about a paper ruin me from seeing what it was trying to do.
But as I have said before It would be easy for me to point out everything I liked about the columns and call it a post. But I wanted to do something a bit different and say what I found unappealing rather than appealing.
No comments:
Post a Comment